Thomson escape bankruptcy professionals say China#39s color Television patent fees - Thomson, regular Television - Network Appliance Market-hc360 HC

Is the patent valid and enforceable? 2. Did the defendant actually did infringe your patent?

Defeat at Trial: It is also possible that your patent suit will go to trial and you will lose. The jury will rule that the patent was invalid or unenforceable, or that defendant did NOT infringe your patent, so the defendant owes you nothing! This, however, is also an unlikely outcome as very few patent infringement suits actually go to trial.

Out-of-Court Settlement: The most likely outcome of most types of civil litigation is an out-of-court settlement. Also, unlike a jury verdict and award, an out-of-court settlement cannot be appealed.

Binding Arbitration: A variation on an out-of-court settlement is binding arbitration.

Possible Outcomes to Your Patent Suit

Thomson has been the Chinese consumer Electronic Patent lingering shadow of corporate head, from DVD To traditional TV, the approved Thomson bankruptcy news, the Chinese consumer electronics industry may not be good news. Renowned intellectual property experts, Beijing Intellectual Property Agent with Li Jun Cheng Liu Fang told bits partner network, "the Chinese color TV enterprises are required to pay annually to Thomson a large number of patent licensing fees, even if the bankruptcy, the license fee contract will not be Tom Johnson's bankruptcy exemption. " In 2003 Thomson proposed to the Chinese enterprises each 1.5 U.S. dollars DVD patent fee; in 2005, Thomson MP3 business to the Chinese charge 75 cents each royalty. Patent if the owner changed, the Chinese color TV enterprises have also changed a company equivalent. However, these contracts permit fee will not exempt Thomson bankruptcy. Patent shall be guilty of such. Despite the worldwide use Thomson joint venture, etc. for industry or market expansion, but its patent exclusivity has never wavered.